Part-Time CFO: Strategic & Forecasting Work

What strategic and forecasting work does a part-time Chief Financial Officer actually lead for a UK growth business — long-range financial planning, scenario modelling, capital allocation, investment appraisal, pricing strategy, capital structure decisions, M&A evaluation, and the broader strategic finance contributions that distinguish substantive senior CFO leadership from operational finance management — and how does concentrated part-time engagement on strategic work often produce better outcomes than spread-thin full-time engagement that consumes senior CFO bandwidth on tasks more appropriately delegated to the broader finance team?

The most consequential CFO work happens in the strategic and forecasting space — long-range planning, scenario modelling, capital allocation, investment appraisal, pricing strategy, capital structure decisions, M&A evaluation, and the analytical work that supports board decisions on the questions that genuinely shape company outcomes. This is also the work where the difference between substantive senior CFO contribution and merely competent operational finance management is most visible. Operational finance work — month-end close, payroll administration, statutory accounts production, basic management accounting — can be discharged adequately by Financial Controllers, qualified accountants, and operational finance teams. Strategic finance work requires senior judgement, pattern recognition from prior similar situations, the analytical rigour to engage with complex modelling questions, and the personal credibility to challenge management assumptions and lead board-level discussions. The CFO’s most distinctive contribution sits firmly in this strategic dimension.

The part-time CFO model is, paradoxically, often particularly well-suited to delivering strategic and forecasting work despite the obvious concern that part-time engagement might be inadequate for the most demanding aspects of CFO contribution. The reasoning is structural: strategic work is not daily operational work that requires continuous presence — it is concentrated analytical and judgement work that can be done in focused blocks of high-quality time, supported by access to the operational finance team for data and analysis. A senior CFO engaging two or three days per week on substantively strategic work, supported by a strong Financial Controller managing day-to-day operational finance, frequently produces better strategic output than a less senior full-time CFO who is consumed by operational matters and never reaches the strategic work the business actually needs. The distinction is between time spent on the most consequential questions versus time spent on the largest volume of questions, and substantive part-time engagement disproportionately allocates to the former.

This article sets out the substantive strategic and forecasting workstreams that part-time CFOs lead in UK growth businesses, the distinction between operational finance and strategic finance work that determines what senior CFO time should be spent on, the relationship between the part-time CFO and the broader finance team, the investor and board dimension where strategic finance work is most visible externally, the engagement structures that support effective strategic CFO contribution, the compensation realities, the common mistakes founders and boards make in structuring strategic CFO engagement, and the recruitment considerations specific to strategic-orientated part-time CFO appointments. It is written for founders, CEOs, and boards of UK growth businesses considering or already engaging part-time CFO support, and for the senior finance leaders whose part-time portfolios increasingly emphasise strategic contribution over operational delivery.

It is written from the perspective of FD Capital’s team — a specialist senior finance recruitment firm placing CFOs, FDs, and senior finance leaders into UK growth businesses since 2018, with substantive engagement supporting strategic-orientated part-time CFO appointments across the SaaS, fintech, healthtech, deep tech, consumer brands, and broader high-growth UK population.

Call 020 3287 9501 or email recruitment@fdcapital.co.uk to discuss strategic-orientated part-time CFO engagement for your business.

---

The Distinction Between Operational and Strategic Finance Work

Effective part-time CFO engagement depends on the appropriate distinction between operational finance work and strategic finance work, with the part-time CFO concentrating on the latter while the broader finance team owns the former.

Operational finance work includes the recurring activities required to run the finance function: month-end close, payroll administration, accounts payable and receivable management, bank reconciliations, VAT returns, statutory account production, day-to-day expense management, basic management accounting, internal control operation, and the routine engagement with auditors, HMRC, and other recurring counterparties. This work is essential, requires substantive professional capability, and is appropriately delegated to Financial Controllers, qualified accountants, and operational finance team members. It is not work that requires senior CFO time, and CFOs who spend disproportionate time on operational matters typically deliver less substantive strategic value than the role’s compensation justifies.

Strategic finance work includes the analytical and judgement-intensive activities that shape company decisions on the matters that materially affect outcomes: long-range financial planning, scenario modelling, capital allocation, investment appraisal, pricing strategy, capital structure decisions, M&A evaluation, fundraising leadership, investor and board engagement on strategic matters, and the broader question of how the finance function supports the company’s strategic direction. This work requires senior judgement that develops through years of similar work, pattern recognition that comes from engagement across multiple businesses, and the analytical rigour to engage with complex modelling questions. It is the distinctive contribution of senior CFOs, and the work that justifies CFO-level compensation.

The practical implication is that the right structure for many growth businesses is part-time CFO engagement leading strategic work, supported by full-time operational finance team capacity (Financial Controller, Senior Management Accountant, FP&A Manager, operational finance staff) running day-to-day operations. The structure delivers substantive senior CFO leadership on the questions that matter, while ensuring the operational finance work that the business depends on continues effectively. CFOs working in this structure typically allocate their part-time engagement heavily toward strategic work, with operational finance touchpoints limited to oversight and exception handling.

---

The Strategic Workstreams Part-Time CFOs Lead

Long-Range Financial Planning

The long-range financial plan (LRP) — typically covering three to five years forward — is one of the most distinctive senior CFO contributions. Unlike the annual budget, which projects a single year with relative precision, the LRP engages with the underlying drivers of business performance over a longer horizon, the strategic decisions that shape those drivers, and the financial outcomes that flow from those decisions. The LRP is the analytical foundation for major strategic decisions: hiring plans, market expansion plans, product investment plans, capital allocation between competing priorities, fundraising sequence and timing, and ultimately the trajectory toward whatever exit or steady-state outcome the company is targeting.

Substantive LRP work involves: identification of the principal drivers of business performance (typically a small number of operational and commercial drivers that dominate the financial outcome); modelling of those drivers under base-case, upside, and downside scenarios; development of the resulting financial projections including P&L, balance sheet, and cash flow; sensitivity analysis around the principal driver assumptions; identification of the strategic decisions the LRP supports or challenges; and engagement with the executive team and board on the implications. Strong LRPs are not Excel models that get shown to investors — they are analytical frameworks that genuinely shape company decisions through ongoing review and refresh.

Scenario Modelling and Sensitivity Analysis

Beyond the LRP itself, scenario modelling is the discipline of analysing how outcomes change under specific alternative assumptions. The scenarios may be macro-driven (recession, sector downturn, currency shock), commercial (loss of major customer, competitor entry, pricing pressure), operational (delivery failure, supply chain disruption, key personnel departure), or strategic (acquisition completion, market entry success or failure, fundraising failure or success). Senior CFOs lead scenario modelling because the work requires both analytical rigour and the strategic judgement to identify which scenarios warrant analysis.

The output of scenario modelling typically includes: identification of the scenarios most material to the business; detailed modelling of each scenario including the financial implications; identification of the corrective actions available under each scenario; and the strategic and board-level implications of the analysis. Done well, scenario modelling materially improves company decision-making by surfacing risks and opportunities that ordinary single-point forecasts obscure. For broader cash forecasting context relevant to short-term scenarios, see our Cash Flow Forecasting Guide.

Capital Allocation Strategy

Capital allocation — the decision about how to deploy the company’s capital across competing uses — is one of the most consequential decisions any company makes. The principal alternatives typically include: investment in sales and marketing for growth; investment in product development; investment in geographic or market expansion; investment in M&A; investment in operational capacity and efficiency; cash preservation against future opportunity; debt repayment; and shareholder distribution where applicable. Each alternative has different return profiles, different risk characteristics, different time horizons, and different strategic implications.

The CFO’s contribution to capital allocation includes: developing the analytical framework for comparing alternatives; modelling the financial returns of specific opportunities under various assumptions; engaging with the board on the strategic priorities that inform capital allocation; and ongoing review of allocated capital against expected returns. Substantive capital allocation work is typically structured around explicit board-level review at appropriate frequency, with the CFO leading the analytical content and the board and executive team engaging on the strategic judgements.

Investment Appraisal

Specific investment decisions — capital expenditure projects, technology investments, market expansion programmes, hiring decisions of material scale — engage standard investment appraisal methodologies that the CFO leads. The principal techniques include net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), payback period (covered in our Payback Period Formula Guide), and various scenario-based extensions. The CFO contribution combines the technical application of these techniques with the judgement about which assumptions are appropriate, what discount rates apply, and how the analysis should inform the decision.

Investment appraisal is one of the areas where senior CFO judgement most distinguishes substantive contribution from junior finance work. The technical mechanics can be applied by relatively junior analysts; the judgement about whether the analysis is genuinely persuasive, what sensitivity analysis is appropriate, and how the conclusions should inform the decision requires senior experience.

Pricing Strategy and Unit Economics

Pricing is typically the most consequential single lever any business has on its financial outcomes — small changes in pricing typically produce disproportionate changes in margin and cash generation. CFO engagement with pricing includes: rigorous analysis of unit economics across customer segments and product lines; assessment of price elasticity through actual customer behaviour rather than assumption; competitive pricing analysis; modelling of pricing strategy alternatives; and engagement with the executive team on pricing decisions. For SaaS businesses specifically, the cohort analytics that drive pricing strategy — gross retention, net retention, expansion revenue, customer acquisition cost relative to lifetime value — are typically led by the CFO with the broader finance team supporting.

The discipline of unit economics is broader than pricing alone and engages with cost analysis as well. Read more on cost analysis methodology in our Cost Analysis Guide and on financial ratios more broadly in our Financial Ratios Guide.

Capital Structure Decisions

Capital structure — the mix of equity, debt, and other financing instruments the business uses — is a strategic decision the CFO leads. The decisions include: when and how much equity to raise (and the implications for dilution and governance); when debt financing is appropriate (senior debt, mezzanine, venture debt, revenue-based financing, asset-based lending — each with different applications); the relationship between funding stages and capital structure; the treatment of working capital financing; and the longer-term capital structure trajectory toward exit or steady state.

The CFO’s contribution combines technical understanding of the various financing instruments with strategic judgement about their appropriate application to the specific business. The work intensifies around fundraising events but is properly an ongoing strategic concern rather than an event-driven exercise.

M&A Evaluation

For businesses pursuing M&A — whether buy-side acquisitions, sell-side processes, or strategic partnerships and joint ventures — the CFO’s strategic contribution is substantial. Buy-side M&A engages with target identification, financial diligence oversight, valuation analysis, deal structure, integration planning, and post-completion integration governance. Sell-side processes engage with vendor due diligence preparation, valuation, buyer engagement, and the broader process management. The CFO’s strategic contribution to M&A is distinct from the operational delivery of specific transactions and engages with the question of whether and when M&A advances company strategy.

For broader context on M&A processes relevant to CFO engagement, see our Financial Due Diligence Guide, Vendor Due Diligence Guide, and our broader M&A content.

---

The Forecasting Workstreams

Forecasting is not a single workstream but a portfolio of related disciplines operating at different time horizons and serving different decision purposes. Senior CFOs lead the forecasting portfolio, with operational finance team members executing within the framework the CFO establishes.

The Thirteen-Week Rolling Cash Forecast

The thirteen-week rolling cash forecast is the standard short-term cash visibility tool for UK growth businesses. The forecast updates weekly, with each new week added at the far end and the historical weeks dropping off. The discipline produces continuous visibility of the cash position thirteen weeks forward — enough to identify emerging issues with sufficient lead time to address them, while remaining short enough that the forecast inputs can be reliably modelled. The CFO typically owns the framework while the operational finance team produces the weekly updates and engages with the underlying inputs.

The Annual Budget Cycle

The annual budget process is the formal exercise of setting the company’s financial expectations for the coming year. Effective budget cycles typically begin three to four months before the new financial year, involve substantive engagement with the executive team and operational leaders, produce a budget that reflects realistic operational plans rather than aspirational targets, and establish the framework for monthly reporting against budget. The CFO leads the process, with the operational finance team supporting through detailed budget building and consolidation.

The mid-year reforecast — typically completed at the half-year point — refreshes the budget assumptions based on actual performance and emerging conditions. Subsequent reforecasts at quarterly or other appropriate intervals continue the discipline through the year. The reforecast cycle is one of the key forums for substantive engagement between CFO, executive team, and board on how the year is actually unfolding versus expectations.

The Long-Range Plan

Distinct from the annual budget, the long-range plan covers three to five years and engages with the strategic trajectory of the business as discussed earlier. The LRP is typically refreshed annually at minimum, more frequently where business circumstances warrant, and serves as the analytical foundation for major strategic decisions.

Driver-Based Modelling

Effective forecasting at all time horizons depends on driver-based modelling — the discipline of modelling the underlying operational drivers (customer counts, conversion rates, churn rates, average order values, headcount levels, hiring rates) and computing the financial outcomes from them, rather than directly forecasting the financial outputs. Driver-based models are more analytically rigorous, more useful for sensitivity analysis, more credible to sophisticated investors, and more useful for ongoing decision support than the simpler approach of directly forecasting revenue and cost lines.

Building substantive driver-based models requires senior CFO judgement on which drivers genuinely dominate business outcomes, how those drivers should be modelled, and how the model should be structured for ongoing use. The work is one of the more distinctive senior CFO contributions and is rarely well-executed without substantive prior experience.

Cohort Analysis

For subscription-based businesses (SaaS, subscription consumer, subscription B2B services), cohort analysis is the analytical foundation for understanding business performance and forecasting future outcomes. The work involves: segmentation of customers into cohorts (typically by acquisition month or quarter); analysis of cohort behaviour over time including retention, expansion, and economics; identification of the patterns that distinguish higher-quality from lower-quality cohorts; and ultimately the forecasting of business outcomes based on cohort behaviour. Strong cohort analysis is one of the most powerful diagnostic tools available to subscription businesses, and the CFO typically leads the work.

---

Why Concentrated Strategic Work Suits the Part-Time Model

The structural reason part-time CFO engagement often produces strong strategic output is that strategic work has different time-shape characteristics than operational work. Operational finance work requires consistent daily presence — month-end happens monthly, payroll runs weekly, customers pay continuously, suppliers invoice continuously. Strategic finance work happens in concentrated bursts: the LRP refresh consumes substantial focused time over several weeks then settles back; investment appraisal happens around specific decision points; capital allocation review happens at structured board cadence; M&A evaluation engages around specific opportunities. The total senior CFO time required for substantive strategic work is meaningful but is not continuously distributed.

Two or three days per week of senior CFO engagement, properly structured, accommodates the strategic workstreams effectively. The CFO can deliver focused strategic blocks during their engagement days, with the operational finance team running day-to-day matters between CFO touchpoints. The structure produces concentrated high-quality strategic output rather than thinly-spread mediocre output across all dimensions of the role.

The further structural advantage is that part-time CFOs typically maintain portfolios across multiple businesses — engaging with two or three growth businesses simultaneously at different stages and in different sectors. The pattern recognition that develops across the portfolio materially improves strategic judgement at any individual business. A CFO engaged at three SaaS businesses simultaneously has visibility into pricing decisions, scenario outcomes, capital allocation choices, and operational benchmarks across all three — and applies that pattern recognition to each. This benefit is genuinely difficult to replicate in full-time engagement at a single business.

---

The Investor and Board Dimension

Strategic CFO work is most visible externally in investor and board engagement. Sophisticated investors — institutional venture capital firms, growth equity investors, private equity sponsors — assess the quality of management teams substantially through the quality of strategic finance work they observe. The forecast accuracy track record, the analytical rigour of board materials, the substance of capital allocation discussion, and the credibility of long-range plans collectively shape investor confidence in the business. Strong CFOs materially affect this dimension; weaker CFOs damage it.

Board materials are one of the principal vehicles through which strategic finance work is communicated. Effective board materials include: clear analytical frameworks rather than data dumps; substantive engagement with the strategic questions facing the business; sensitivity analysis that supports board judgement; clear identification of the decisions the board needs to make; and ongoing tracking of strategic and financial performance against expectations. CFOs who produce strong board materials typically find their broader strategic contribution amplified — the materials become the foundation for substantive board discussion rather than passive consumption.

Investor engagement extends beyond formal board meetings. Quarterly investor reports, ad hoc investor updates, fundraising materials, and the ongoing relationship management with major investors collectively form the investor-facing dimension of CFO work. Strong CFOs maintain proactive investor engagement that supports the company through both steady-state operation and the inevitable challenges. Read more on the broader CFO role in fundraising in our CFO’s Role in Fundraising Guide and on what investor-readiness actually means in our Investor Ready CFO Guide.

---

The Relationship with the Operational Finance Team

Effective part-time strategic CFO engagement depends critically on a competent operational finance team running day-to-day finance under the CFO’s framework. The Financial Controller is typically the most important operational finance role — owning month-end close, statutory reporting, the operational finance team, the relationship with external auditors, and the day-to-day operational finance discipline. Where the Financial Controller is strong, the part-time CFO model works well; where the Financial Controller is weak or absent, even the most capable part-time CFO cannot deliver substantive strategic contribution because operational matters consume the available bandwidth.

The CFO’s relationship with the Financial Controller is therefore one of the most consequential elements of the engagement. Effective relationships are characterised by clear delegation of operational matters to the Controller, with CFO oversight focused on framework-setting and exception handling rather than daily engagement; substantive coaching and development of the Controller, particularly for Controllers who may eventually progress to CFO roles; and regular structured touchpoints (typically weekly) that maintain alignment without consuming excessive time.

For businesses without strong Financial Controller capability, the right sequence is often to recruit the Financial Controller first, then engage the part-time CFO. This sequence ensures the operational foundation is in place before strategic CFO engagement begins, avoiding the situation where the part-time CFO is consumed by operational matters that should be the Controller’s responsibility. FD Capital supports recruitment of both roles and frequently advises on sequencing.

---

Engagement Structure for Strategic Part-Time CFO Work

Days per week. Strategic-orientated part-time CFO engagement typically runs two to three days per week for substantive growth businesses. The specific level depends on the breadth of strategic work, the stage of the business, the strength of the operational finance team, and the intensity of upcoming strategic events (fundraising, M&A, major strategic reviews).

Time allocation within the engagement. The optimal allocation typically concentrates strategic work in focused blocks rather than spreading it across all engagement days. A CFO engaged three days per week might allocate two of those days to strategic work (LRP refresh, scenario modelling, investment appraisal, board material development) and one day to operational oversight and finance team development. The pattern produces concentrated high-quality strategic output while maintaining appropriate operational connection.

Touchpoints with the executive team. Effective strategic CFO engagement typically includes structured weekly touchpoints with the CEO and other key executives, attendance at executive committee meetings (typically weekly or fortnightly), and ad hoc engagement around specific strategic questions. Vague “available as needed” arrangements typically produce less substantive engagement than structured touchpoints with appropriate flexibility for specific situations.

Board engagement. Strategic CFOs typically attend board meetings, lead the financial sections of board materials, and own ongoing investor engagement on financial matters. Board engagement consumes a meaningful portion of the part-time CFO’s time around quarterly board meetings, annual strategy days, and other governance events.

Notice periods and continuity. Notice periods are typically three to six months for substantive part-time CFO engagements, providing both parties with appropriate transition time. The continuity expectation is important — strategic work depends on accumulated business understanding that develops over months and years, and short-tenure engagements rarely produce substantive strategic output.

---

Compensation for Strategic Part-Time CFO Engagement

Compensation for strategic-orientated part-time CFO engagement reflects the seniority required and the substantive nature of the contribution.

Day rates. Cash compensation typically runs £1,000 to £1,800 per day for substantive senior part-time CFOs in the UK growth business market. The specific level reflects the CFO’s prior track record, sector experience, fundraising experience, and the specific demands of the engagement. CFOs with substantive prior unicorn or successful exit track record command the upper end of these ranges; CFOs earlier in their part-time portfolio careers operate at lower rates while building track record.

Equity participation. Equity participation alongside cash compensation is increasingly common in strategic part-time CFO engagements, recognising the long-term value the CFO contributes to outcomes. Allocations typically use the same EMI or unapproved option framework as senior hires, with vesting schedules of three to four years and standard leaver provisions. Specific allocations vary but typically range from 0.25% to 1.0% of the cap table for substantive part-time CFO engagements at growth-stage businesses.

Annualised compensation. Combined cash and equity compensation for substantive strategic part-time CFO engagements typically reaches £150,000 to £400,000 in equivalent annual terms for two to three day per week arrangements, comparing favourably to comparable full-time CFO compensation at similar businesses.

For broader context on part-time CFO economics see our Fractional CFO Cost and ROI Guide.

---

Common Mistakes in Strategic Part-Time CFO Engagement

Mistake one: Engaging a CFO before the operational finance foundation is in place. Without a competent Financial Controller and operational finance team, the part-time CFO is consumed by operational matters and cannot deliver the strategic work the engagement was designed to produce. The remedy is sequencing — Financial Controller first, then part-time CFO — for businesses building from a low operational finance base.

Mistake two: Inadequate scope clarity. Part-time CFO engagements without clear scope often default to operational firefighting rather than the strategic contribution the CFO’s seniority justifies. The remedy is explicit scope definition: which strategic workstreams the CFO leads, which operational matters the CFO oversees rather than executes, what board and investor engagement the CFO owns, and what time allocation supports each dimension.

Mistake three: Failing to invest in board materials and investor engagement. Some part-time CFO engagements produce strong internal strategic work that fails to translate into the board and investor engagement that ultimately determines outcomes. Strong CFOs invest deliberately in board materials quality and investor relationships, recognising that this dimension is where strategic work becomes externally visible.

Mistake four: Mismatching CFO experience to business stage. Strategic CFO contribution depends materially on the CFO’s prior experience matching the business’s specific challenges. A SaaS business benefits from a CFO with prior SaaS track record; a fintech with a CFO who has navigated FCA authorisation; a deep tech business with a CFO who has managed long capital cycles. Generic “experienced CFO” without sector-specific match typically produces weaker outcomes than specific match would.

Mistake five: Treating the engagement as transactional. Some founders engage part-time CFOs around specific events (fundraising rounds, M&A processes) and disengage between events. The pattern produces lower-quality strategic work because business understanding requires continuous engagement to develop and maintain. Continuous engagement at appropriate cadence, even at lower intensity between specific events, produces materially better strategic contribution.

Mistake six: Inadequate review and refresh of the engagement. Effective part-time CFO engagements should be reviewed periodically — typically annually — with both parties assessing whether the structure remains appropriate as the business evolves. Engagements that continue without review often drift into either inadequate intensity (as the business outgrows the engagement) or excessive intensity (as the engagement consumes more time than the business warrants).

---

How FD Capital Approaches Strategic Part-Time CFO Recruitment

FD Capital has placed part-time CFOs into UK growth businesses since 2018, with substantive engagement supporting strategic-orientated appointments where the CFO contribution focuses on long-range planning, scenario modelling, capital allocation, investment appraisal, pricing strategy, capital structure decisions, M&A evaluation, and board and investor engagement. Our network includes part-time CFO candidates whose track records emphasise strategic contribution and who maintain portfolios across multiple growth businesses simultaneously.

Initial briefing within 24 hours of enquiry, with Adrian Lawrence FCA personally leading briefings for senior part-time CFO mandates given the substantive nature of strategic CFO contribution. Written role specification by day two covering business stage, sector specifics, current finance team structure, expected CFO contribution emphasis, days per week, equity expectations, and timeline. Targeted shortlist within five to ten working days. Appointment typically completing within three to six weeks.

Initial consultation is confidential and at no charge. Call 020 3287 9501 for an immediate strategic part-time CFO requirement, or email recruitment@fdcapital.co.uk.

---

Related Reading

• Part-Time CFO: The Complete UK Guide — broader part-time CFO context across all business stages
• Part-Time CFO for High-Growth Businesses — high-growth Series A through Series C focus
• Part-Time CFO in Crisis and Recession — crisis-context engagement
• The Modern CFO: Strategic Leadership Beyond the Numbers — broader strategic CFO context
• Cash Flow Forecasting: A Complete Guide — short-term forecasting discipline
• Payback Period Formula: A UK CFO’s Guide — investment appraisal methodology
• Cost Analysis: A UK CFO’s Guide to Business Costing — cost analysis methodology relevant to pricing strategy
• Financial Ratios: A UK CFO’s Guide — analytical framework for financial performance assessment
• Financial Metrics & KPIs: A UK CFO’s Guide — operational KPIs and board dashboard design
• The CFO’s Role in Fundraising — substantive CFO contribution to fundraising rounds
• Investor Ready CFO — what “investor ready” actually means for the finance function
• Fractional CFO Cost and ROI — economic analysis of fractional engagements

FD Capital Recruitment Services

• Fractional CFO Services — fractional and part-time CFO engagement
• Hire an FD or CFO — broader senior finance recruitment
• Interim CFO and FD Recruitment — interim senior finance appointments
• Private Equity CFO Recruitment — CFO recruitment for PE-backed businesses
• NED Recruitment — Non-Executive Director recruitment

External References

• ICAEW Corporate Finance Faculty — professional resources on corporate finance and strategic financial planning
• ICAEW Business and Financial Management — professional resources on financial management discipline
• FRC UK Corporate Governance Code — the governance framework for board engagement on strategic matters
• Companies Act 2006 — including sections 171-177 setting out directors’ general duties relevant to strategic decision-making
• ICAEW — professional body for Chartered Accountants

---