The Role of Fractional FD in Capital Structure Optimisation (Debt vs Equity)

How does a fractional Finance Director actually contribute to UK capital structure decisions — including the debt versus equity choices that shape commercial flexibility, the cap table architecture that determines exit economics, and the equity incentive design that supports talent retention through scaling?

Capital structure work is one of the most consequential dimensions of UK senior finance leadership. The decisions made — whether to fund growth through debt or equity, what specific debt instruments fit the business’s profile, how to structure preference share arrangements with institutional investors, what equity incentive schemes to deploy for the team, how to manage the cap table through successive funding rounds — shape the business’s trajectory for years and frequently determine the value founders and team members ultimately realise. Getting these decisions right requires senior finance judgement combined with substantive UK technical knowledge of the available instruments, applicable regulations, and tax consequences.

Most UK businesses below full-time FD scale don’t have this senior finance capability in-house. The capital structure decisions get made anyway — typically at fundraise points, when banks are approached for facilities, when employee share schemes are introduced, when secondary opportunities arise — but often with insufficient specialist input. The consequences emerge later: dilution that wasn’t necessary, debt structures that constrain operational flexibility, cap tables that complicate exit, equity schemes that don’t deliver the intended retention value, and tax inefficiencies that compound over years. Fractional FD engagement during these decisions delivers the senior judgement at compatible economics for businesses that wouldn’t otherwise have access to it.

This guide sets out how fractional FDs contribute to UK capital structure work. The debt versus equity framework that shapes the underlying choice, the specific debt instruments available to UK growing businesses, the equity instruments and structures that institutional rounds typically deploy, the cap table architecture that supports clean exit economics, the UK equity incentive landscape (EMI, growth shares, unapproved options) and how to deploy each, the specific contributions fractional FDs make to this work, and the boundaries where external advisors take primary responsibility.

It is written from the perspective of FD Capital’s team — a specialist finance recruitment firm placing fractional FDs into UK growing businesses since 2018, including extensive engagement with capital structure and cap table work for SMEs, scale-ups, and PE-backed portfolio companies.

Call 020 3287 9501 or email recruitment@fdcapital.co.uk to discuss fractional FD engagement on capital structure and cap table work.

---

Why Capital Structure Matters Beyond the Headline Numbers

Capital structure decisions affect business outcomes through dimensions that aren’t always visible at the moment of decision but compound over time.

Dilution and founder economics. Each equity round dilutes existing shareholders. The cumulative dilution across multiple rounds shapes what founders and early investors realise at exit. Decisions that look small in isolation — accepting an extra 2% dilution to secure better terms, allowing aggressive option pool refresh, agreeing dilution-favourable preference share terms — compound across rounds.

Operational flexibility. Debt structures impose constraints — covenants, security packages, repayment schedules, change-of-control restrictions, restrictions on additional borrowing or asset sales. Tighter constraints reduce operational flexibility; looser constraints preserve it. The choice affects what the business can do during the debt’s life.

Cost of capital. Debt and equity have different costs. Debt is typically cheaper than equity but adds risk through fixed obligations. Equity is more expensive but flexible. The blend affects weighted cost of capital and ultimately what return the business needs to generate to create shareholder value.

Exit economics. Cap table structure shapes what each shareholder receives at exit. Preference share liquidation preferences, participation rights, anti-dilution protection, drag-along thresholds all affect the exit waterfall. Structures that look reasonable at investment can produce dramatically uneven exit outcomes.

Tax efficiency. UK tax outcomes for founders, employees, and investors depend substantially on how share structures are designed and how equity incentives are deployed. EMI versus unapproved options, ordinary shares versus growth shares, structuring for SEIS/EIS investor relief, structuring for Business Asset Disposal Relief on founder exit — each produces different tax outcomes.

Talent retention. Equity incentives are a primary retention lever for growing UK businesses unable to compete on cash compensation alone. The scheme design — what proportion of equity is reserved, how it vests, what triggers exercise, how leavers are treated — shapes whether the equity actually retains talent or whether it produces friction without retention benefit.

Investor relationships. The structures agreed during fundraises shape the ongoing relationship with institutional investors. Information rights, board observer rights, consent rights on specified matters, preemption rights on subsequent rounds. The negotiated structure affects how the business operates with investor presence rather than purely the headline valuation.

---

The Debt Versus Equity Framework

The fundamental capital structure choice — debt or equity to fund growth — depends on specific dimensions of the business’s situation. Strong fractional FDs apply structured analysis rather than defaulting to one mode.

Cash generation profile. Debt requires regular interest and principal payments. Businesses with predictable cash generation can support debt service; businesses with volatile or negative cash flow cannot. Most UK pre-profit scale-ups can’t support material debt service from operations and need equity for growth. Cash-generating businesses sometimes have meaningful debt capacity that deploying instead of further equity reduces dilution materially.

Asset base. Debt is typically secured against assets — receivables, inventory, plant and equipment, real estate. Asset-light businesses (most modern technology businesses, many service businesses) have limited debt capacity beyond unsecured facilities. Asset-heavy businesses (manufacturing, distribution, property) have material debt capacity that lighter businesses don’t.

Stage of development. Pre-revenue and pre-profit businesses generally fund through equity. Growth-stage businesses with revenue but limited profit have access to venture debt and growth capital alongside equity. Mature profitable businesses have full access to bank debt, mezzanine, and bond market for larger businesses. The available instruments shift through stages.

Growth ambition and timeline. High-growth ambitions requiring substantial capital deployment over short timelines typically need equity — debt service obligations would compete with growth investment for the same cash. More measured growth ambitions can be funded through debt where the cash generation supports it.

Cost of capital comparison. Debt interest is tax-deductible; equity returns aren’t. Debt at 8% real cost compares to equity that needs to generate substantially more to deliver target returns. The cost differential favours debt where the business can support it.

Control implications. Equity rounds bring new shareholders with rights — board representation, consent rights, ongoing reporting expectations. Debt brings constraints but not the same governance involvement. Founders prioritising control sometimes accept higher cost of capital to preserve it.

Optionality preservation. Some capital structure decisions preserve future optionality; others foreclose it. Convertible instruments preserve optionality between debt and equity outcomes. Subordinated debt with payment-in-kind features preserves cash optionality. Ordinary shares (rather than preference) preserve later structure flexibility. Strong fractional FDs evaluate optionality alongside immediate economics.

Sponsor or investor preferences. Where the business has institutional investors, their preferences shape structure choices. PE sponsors typically prefer leverage; venture investors typically prefer equity-based growth funding. Senior finance leaders work within these preferences while ensuring the business’s own analysis is presented.

---

UK Debt Instruments for Growing Businesses

The UK debt landscape for growing businesses includes specific instruments that fit different situations. Strong fractional FDs match instrument to context rather than defaulting to whichever the business already uses.

Bank term loans and revolving credit facilities. Traditional bank lending — term loans for specific purposes, revolving credit facilities for working capital. UK clearing banks (HSBC, Barclays, NatWest, Lloyds) plus challengers (OakNorth, Allica, Aldermore) and specialist lenders (Triple Point, ThinCats) all participate. Pricing typically references SONIA (replacing LIBOR) plus margin reflecting credit risk. Suitable for established businesses with predictable cash flow and security to offer.

Asset-based lending. Lending secured specifically against assets — invoice finance against receivables, asset finance against plant or vehicles, stock finance against inventory. ABL providers (Bibby Financial, Aldermore, Close Brothers, specialist providers) typically advance higher percentages of asset value than general bank lending against the same security. Suitable for working-capital-intensive businesses with strong asset bases.

Venture debt. Debt for venture-backed scale-ups, typically structured to complement equity rounds. Providers in the UK market include Kreos Capital, Columbia Lake Partners, Hercules Capital (US-based but UK active), and others. Pricing is typically in the 10-13% range with warrants attached. Suitable for venture-funded businesses needing to extend runway between equity rounds without additional dilution.

Growth capital. Subordinated debt or hybrid debt-equity for growth-stage businesses. Providers like BGF (Business Growth Fund), MML Capital, LDC (Lloyds Development Capital), and specialist funds. Often combined with minority equity participation. Suitable for established growing businesses needing growth capital without the dilution of full equity rounds or the constraints of conventional senior debt.

Mezzanine and unitranche. Higher-cost subordinated debt for larger transactions. Mezzanine sits between senior debt and equity in the capital structure with corresponding pricing (typically 10-15%). Unitranche combines senior and subordinated debt into single facility from one lender. Used in mid-market PE transactions and growth situations requiring more leverage than senior debt alone supports.

R&D tax credit financing. Specialist lending against future R&D tax credit claims. Providers advance percentages of the claim ahead of HMRC payment, smoothing cash flow for R&D-intensive businesses. Used by technology and life sciences scale-ups where R&D claims are material recurring cash inflows.

Trade finance. Lending to support specific trade transactions — letters of credit, supply chain finance, export finance. UK Export Finance (UKEF) provides government-backed support for exporters. Used by businesses with international trade where conventional financing doesn’t fit specific transaction needs.

Convertible loan notes. Debt that converts to equity at specified events (typically next equity round or maturity). Common in UK seed and Series A bridge situations. Allows fundraising without immediate valuation; valuation typically set at next priced round with discount and/or cap protecting the convertible note holder.

Advance Subscription Agreements (ASAs). UK-specific instrument similar to convertible notes but structured as advance subscription for future shares rather than as debt. ASAs preserve SEIS/EIS eligibility for the investor (which conventional convertible notes typically don’t). Common in UK pre-Series A bridges.

---

UK Equity Instruments and Round Structures

Equity rounds in the UK typically involve specific instruments and structural elements that institutional investors expect. Strong fractional FDs navigate these without surprise.

Ordinary shares. The base equity layer — typically held by founders, employees through exercised options, and earlier individual investors. Ordinary shares carry voting rights and economic participation but rank behind preference shares in liquidation events.

Preference shares. The instrument used in most institutional equity rounds. Preference shares carry specific rights — liquidation preference (typically 1x non-participating in current UK practice; sometimes higher multiples or participating in less favourable markets), preferential dividend rights (usually accruing rather than cash-pay), anti-dilution protection (broad-based weighted average is standard; full ratchet is aggressive), preemption rights, drag-along provisions, tag-along rights, information rights, board representation. The specific terms within each category matter materially.

Convertible preference shares. Preference shares that convert to ordinary at exit (typically 1:1 unless anti-dilution adjustment applies). The standard structure for UK institutional equity rounds.

Participating preference shares. Preference shares that receive both their liquidation preference and their pro-rata share of remaining proceeds. More aggressive than standard non-participating structure; less common in current UK market but appears in some specific contexts.

Multiple share classes. Some businesses end up with multiple preference share classes — typically Series A Preference, Series B Preference, etc. — each with its own rights stack. The complexity grows through rounds; cap table cleanup at exit sometimes requires consolidating classes through agreed conversions.

Founder shares with specific provisions. Founder ordinary shares sometimes have specific provisions — vesting schedules with reverse vesting protecting investors against founder departure, founder leaver provisions distinguishing good and bad leavers, founder lock-up periods. These provisions emerged from US practice but appear increasingly in UK rounds.

Growth shares. A specific UK structure where shares are issued at nominal value and only participate in growth above a threshold. Growth shares are sometimes used as employee equity instruments where EMI isn’t available; they have specific tax-efficient treatment when properly structured. See Equity Incentives section below.

---

Cap Table Architecture and Management

The cap table — the record of who owns what at any given time — is fundamental to capital structure work. Strong fractional FDs treat cap table management as substantive work rather than administrative recording.

Cap table integrity. The cap table needs to be accurate at all times — every share issuance properly authorised under the company’s articles, every option grant approved by the Board with proper documentation, every share transfer properly recorded with stamp duty considered, every preemption right respected during issuances. Cap table errors compound over time; cleanup at exit is expensive and sometimes impossible without renegotiation.

Cap table software. Modern UK growing businesses typically use cap table management software — Carta, Capdesk (now Vestd), Ledgy, Shareworks. The software automates cap table maintenance, scenario modelling, employee equity administration, and waterfall analysis. Implementation is justified for businesses approaching meaningful complexity (multiple share classes, employee option pool, preparation for institutional rounds).

Dilution modelling. Strong fractional FDs run dilution scenarios for current shareholders — what does this round do, what would the next anticipated round do, what does an option pool refresh add, what does the exit waterfall look like across different exit values. The modelling supports founder and Board decisions on round sizing, valuation negotiation, and option pool decisions.

Option pool management. Most institutional rounds require option pool refresh before the round closes — investors typically push for the option pool to be increased by the company before the round, diluting existing shareholders rather than the new investors. Strong fractional FDs negotiate the option pool size carefully, modelling the dilution implications and pushing back where the proposed pool exceeds genuine talent acquisition needs.

Authorisation discipline. Share issuances and option grants require proper Board authorisation under the company’s articles, with allotment authorities and preemption disapplications where required. Strong fractional FDs work with company secretarial support to ensure each issuance is properly authorised, removing the cleanup work that exit due diligence otherwise produces.

Stamp duty on transfers. UK stamp duty applies to share transfers above £1,000 at 0.5% rounded up to nearest £5. Stamp duty is often overlooked in informal transfers; HMRC enforcement on backlogs can produce significant unexpected liabilities. Strong fractional FDs ensure stamp duty is properly considered.

Investor reporting on cap table. Institutional investors typically have information rights including periodic cap table updates. Strong fractional FDs maintain reporting cadence that meets the obligations and supports investor relationship management.

Exit waterfall scenarios. Before any exit process, the waterfall — what each shareholder receives at different exit values — needs to be modelled in detail. Preference liquidation preferences, participation rights, option exercise costs, transaction costs all affect the waterfall. The modelling sometimes surfaces unexpected outcomes that warrant pre-exit cap table cleanup.

---

UK Equity Incentive Schemes for Employees

Equity incentive schemes are central to UK growing business retention strategy. The available structures have different tax treatment, eligibility constraints, and operational mechanics. Strong fractional FDs help businesses choose and operate the right structure.

Enterprise Management Incentives (EMI). The most tax-advantaged UK option scheme for qualifying businesses. EMI requirements include: gross assets below £30m at grant; fewer than 250 full-time-equivalent employees; carrying on a qualifying trade (most trades qualify; some excluded including financial services, legal services, property dealing); independent (not subsidiary of another company); UK-resident. Per-individual limit is £250,000 unexercised options; total scheme limit is £3m. When properly structured (exercise price equal to or above market value at grant; HMRC notification within 92 days of grant), EMI options have no income tax or NIC on grant or exercise, with gains on disposal qualifying for Business Asset Disposal Relief at 14% (rising to 18% from April 2026) where the £1m lifetime allowance hasn’t been used.

Growth shares. An alternative structure where employees receive shares (rather than options) that participate only in value above a threshold. Growth shares are issued at nominal value (which represents the current value above which growth participates). When properly structured with realistic valuation and threshold, the shares carry minimal income tax exposure on issue. Used where EMI isn’t available — businesses outside EMI eligibility, employees outside EMI eligibility, or where specific structural features are needed that EMI doesn’t support.

Unapproved share options. Standard share options without HMRC tax-advantaged treatment. Income tax and NIC apply on the gain at exercise (the difference between exercise price and market value at exercise). Unapproved options are simpler to operate than EMI but tax-inefficient. Used where EMI isn’t available, where the option grants are too large for EMI individual limits, or where the business hasn’t engaged with EMI implementation.

Restricted Stock Units (RSUs). Common in US-headquartered groups extending equity to UK employees. RSUs vest over time and are taxed as employment income on vesting (subject to UK income tax and NIC). Less tax-efficient than EMI but operationally simpler for international groups. Some specific UK considerations apply — particularly around timing of taxation and the relationship between vesting and the UK PAYE/NIC framework.

Save As You Earn (SAYE) schemes. Tax-advantaged scheme allowing employees to save monthly for three or five years and use savings to exercise options at a discount. Less commonly used in growing businesses than EMI but appears in some specific UK contexts including listed companies.

Share Incentive Plans (SIPs). Tax-advantaged scheme allowing employees to acquire shares from pre-tax salary. More commonly used in established and listed UK businesses than in growing private companies.

Phantom share schemes. Cash-settled schemes that mirror equity economics without actual share issuance. Provide retention benefit similar to equity without dilution; cash-settled rather than equity-settled. Used where actual equity issuance isn’t preferred for control or operational reasons. Phantom schemes are taxed as employment income on payment, less favourable than EMI but appropriate in specific contexts.

---

EMI Scheme Implementation: Specific Considerations

EMI is sufficiently common in UK growing businesses that specific implementation considerations warrant focus. Strong fractional FDs guide businesses through these.

HMRC valuation agreement. Before grants, businesses typically request HMRC’s agreement on the market value of shares — the basis for option exercise prices. The HMRC valuation process supports tax certainty; without it, exercise price determination relies on the directors’ own valuation, which HMRC can subsequently challenge. The valuation agreement typically uses recent transaction price (last funding round) as the starting point with appropriate adjustments.

Option terms documentation. Each EMI option requires individual option agreement specifying exercise price, vesting schedule, exercise period, performance conditions, leaver provisions, and other specific terms. The option agreement is the binding document; weak documentation creates exposure during exit.

Vesting schedule. Standard UK EMI vesting is four years with one-year cliff (no vesting in first year, then 25% at one year and monthly thereafter). Variations include shorter vesting for senior hires, performance-based vesting, accelerated vesting on change of control. The vesting design balances retention against the genuine equity grant intended.

92-day notification. EMI grants must be notified to HMRC within 92 days of grant. Failure produces loss of EMI status — converting the option to unapproved with corresponding tax treatment. The deadline is hard; strong fractional FDs maintain the discipline to ensure notifications happen on time.

Annual return. EMI schemes require annual returns to HMRC by 6 July following the tax year end. The return covers grants, exercises, lapses, and adjustments during the year. Late returns produce penalties.

Disqualifying events. Specific events disqualify EMI options — the company ceasing to qualify, the employee ceasing to meet working time requirements (25 hours per week or 75% of working time), specific share variations. Strong fractional FDs monitor for disqualifying events and respond appropriately.

Exercise mechanics at exit. Most EMI options exercise at exit. The mechanics — typically same-day exercise and sale — produce the cash to fund the exercise price and any tax due. Strong fractional FDs work with the exit advisors to coordinate exercise mechanics smoothly.

Leaver provisions. What happens to vested and unvested options when employees leave. Standard provisions distinguish good leavers (typically retain vested options for limited exercise period) from bad leavers (typically lose all options). Strong leaver provisions protect both the business and the leaving employee from disputes.

---

What Fractional FDs Specifically Contribute to Capital Structure Work

The specific value fractional FDs add to capital structure work spans several dimensions.

Pre-fundraise preparation. Before approaching investors, the business needs preparation — financial model with appropriate scenarios, data room with cleaned cap table and supporting documents, defensible valuation analysis, clear use of proceeds. Fractional FDs lead this preparation, producing materials that withstand institutional investor diligence.

Term sheet evaluation and negotiation. When term sheets arrive, the financial implications need careful evaluation. Liquidation preference structure, anti-dilution mechanics, option pool refresh expectations, founder vesting provisions, board composition, consent rights — each affects the business’s economics or operations. Strong fractional FDs work alongside legal counsel on term sheet negotiation, focusing on the financial dimensions while lawyers handle the legal structure.

Bank facility negotiation. When approaching banks for facilities, strong fractional FDs lead the engagement — preparing the credit memorandum, presenting to credit teams, negotiating covenant levels and structures, managing the documentation review. The fractional FD’s banking sophistication directly affects the facility terms achieved.

Cap table cleanup. Where cap tables have accumulated complexity through informal grants, undocumented transfers, or structural complications, fractional FDs lead the cleanup work — typically before institutional rounds or exit processes where the cleanup becomes visible.

EMI scheme implementation and operation. From scheme design through HMRC valuation to ongoing administration — fractional FDs typically lead EMI work, working with specialist legal and tax advisors on the technical dimensions while owning the operational management.

Valuation analysis. Whether for fundraising, EMI valuation, secondary transactions, or other purposes — valuation analysis benefits from finance leadership. Strong fractional FDs apply standard valuation methodologies (DCF, comparable companies, comparable transactions) appropriately to the situation.

Investor relations rhythm. After fundraises, the ongoing investor relationship needs management. Periodic reporting, board materials, updates between meetings, engagement on specific matters. Fractional FDs typically own this rhythm at fractional engagement intensity.

Exit preparation. Where businesses are approaching exit (sale, secondary, IPO), capital structure cleanup and optimisation is part of preparation. Fractional FDs working with the business through pre-exit periods address the structural dimensions that affect exit economics.

---

Boundaries: Where External Advisors Take Primary Responsibility

Capital structure work involves multiple specialist disciplines. Fractional FDs coordinate with external advisors but don’t replace them.

Legal counsel. Term sheets, shareholders’ agreements, articles of association, share allotment authorities, employment-related share scheme documentation — all require specialist UK legal advice. Specialist firms (Bird & Bird, Taylor Wessing, Goodwin Procter, Cooley, Bristows, Mishcon, Withers, smaller specialist firms) handle UK growing business legal work; fractional FDs work with the chosen firm rather than substituting for legal advice.

Tax advisors. EMI scheme design, growth share structuring, EIS/SEIS application, founder tax planning, employee tax considerations — all warrant specialist tax advice. Big 4 firms, mid-tier accountancy firms, and specialist tax boutiques handle this work. Fractional FDs ensure tax advice is properly engaged rather than substituting their own tax judgement.

Corporate finance advisors. Material fundraises, sale processes, and acquisition processes typically warrant corporate finance advisory engagement. The CF advisor handles process management, investor or buyer engagement, deal negotiation; the fractional FD provides the financial leadership and technical input the CF advisor needs from the business.

Specialist valuers. Where formal valuations are needed — HMRC EMI valuations, valuations for tax purposes, valuations for share buybacks — specialist valuation firms produce the actual valuation. Fractional FDs provide the data and context but typically don’t produce the valuation themselves.

Company secretarial support. Statutory filings, share allotment paperwork, EMI annual returns, persons of significant control updates — typically handled through company secretarial advisors (smaller specialist firms or larger firms’ company secretarial teams). Fractional FDs ensure the work is properly resourced rather than handling it directly.

The fractional FD’s contribution is providing senior finance judgement, leading internal preparation, coordinating external advisors, and ensuring the business’s interests are properly represented across the multiple specialist dimensions involved in capital structure work.

---

Common Capital Structure Mistakes Fractional FDs Help Avoid

Specific recurring mistakes in UK capital structure work warrant particular attention.

Excessive option pool refresh before rounds. Investors push for larger option pools than business genuinely needs; founders accept the dilution without enough resistance. Strong fractional FDs model the option pool’s actual usage realistically and push back on refresh sizing.

Aggressive liquidation preference structures. Multiple liquidation preferences or participating preference structures look reasonable in growth scenarios but become disastrous in disappointing exit scenarios. Strong fractional FDs evaluate liquidation preference implications across the full exit value distribution.

Anti-dilution at full ratchet rather than weighted average. Full ratchet anti-dilution can produce massive dilution to existing shareholders in down rounds. Broad-based weighted average is standard UK practice; full ratchet should be resisted.

Failure to obtain HMRC EMI valuation. Granting EMI options without HMRC valuation agreement creates risk that HMRC subsequently challenges the exercise price and converts the options to unapproved status. The valuation process is straightforward; failure to use it is unforced error.

Late EMI notification. Missing the 92-day HMRC notification deadline disqualifies the option from EMI status. The discipline to track and meet notifications matters.

Cap table errors that compound. Informal share grants, undocumented transfers, missing preemption disapplications. Each error becomes harder to fix as time passes; cleanup at exit can be expensive or impossible.

Excessive debt for asset-light businesses. Debt structures that work for asset-heavy businesses can sink asset-light ones during cash flow downturns. Matching debt structure to business model fundamentals is essential.

Covenant levels that constrain operations. Tight covenants force frequent renegotiation or constrain commercial decisions. Strong fractional FDs negotiate covenant levels with realistic scenario testing, accepting slightly higher pricing for adequate operational headroom.

Convertible note caps that don’t anticipate scale. Convertible loan note caps set without genuine analysis of likely valuation in next priced round produce unintended dilution outcomes. Strong fractional FDs run scenario analysis on cap implications before agreeing convertible terms.

Founder vesting that doesn’t reflect commitment. Reverse vesting on founder shares is now standard in institutional rounds; founders sometimes accept aggressive vesting without negotiation. Strong fractional FDs help founders evaluate vesting against commitment patterns.

---

How FD Capital Works on Capital Structure Engagements

FD Capital places fractional FDs into UK businesses for capital structure and cap table work — fundraise leadership, debt facility negotiation, cap table cleanup, EMI scheme implementation, and pre-exit structural work. Our matching specifically prioritises capital structure track record alongside general fractional FD capability.

Our network includes fractional FDs with substantive UK fundraising experience across SEIS/EIS, Series A, Series B, growth equity, debt facility negotiation, and exit transactions. We match candidates based on the specific capital structure context the business faces — early-stage equity round preparation, scale-up debt and equity blend decisions, PE portfolio cap table cleanup, pre-exit structural optimisation.

Adrian personally screens candidates for capital structure-intensive engagements. Initial introduction is typically within 48 hours for urgent requirements, with full shortlist within eight working days for less time-pressured engagements.

Initial consultation is confidential and at no charge. Call 020 3287 9501 or email recruitment@fdcapital.co.uk to discuss fractional FD engagement on capital structure or cap table work.

---

Related Reading

• Fractional FD for UK Scale-Ups — fractional FD engagement in scale-up context
• Fractional FD for UK Tech Companies — tech-specific fractional FD context including EMI implementation
• Fractional FD for UK SMEs & Startups — early-stage fractional FD context
• Fractional FD for M&A and Exit Planning — exit-focused fractional FD work
• The CFO’s Role in Fundraising & Investor Relations — CFO-level fundraising leadership
• Fractional CFO for M&A and Exit Planning — CFO-level transactional work
• Fractional FD: Value Creation in PE Portfolios — PE portfolio fractional FD context
• Fractional FD: PE Exit & Due Diligence Support — PE exit support
• CFO Strategic Leadership: The Complete UK Guide — strategic CFO leadership context

FD Capital Recruitment Services

• Fractional FD — fractional Finance Director recruitment
• Fractional CFO — fractional CFO recruitment
• Finance Director Recruitment — permanent FD search
• CFO Recruitment — permanent CFO search
• Interim Finance Director — time-limited full-time FD cover
• Interim CFO — time-limited CFO cover
• Financial Controller Recruitment — operational finance role recruitment

External References

• ICAEW — professional body for Chartered Accountants
• ICAEW Corporate Finance Faculty — corporate finance professional resources
• HMRC — UK tax framework relevant to capital structure decisions
• HMRC EMI Guidance — EMI scheme rules and operational guidance
• HMRC Business Asset Disposal Relief — BADR framework for share disposals
• HMRC EIS Guidance — Enterprise Investment Scheme framework for investors
• Companies Act 2006 — share capital, allotment, distributable profits framework
• BGF (Business Growth Fund) — UK growth capital provider
• UK Export Finance (UKEF) — government export finance support

---