Determining What’s Regulated, Whether You Need Authorisation, and the Boundaries of FCA Jurisdiction
PERG — the Perimeter Guidance Manual — is the FCA Handbook module that provides authoritative guidance on which activities fall within the FCA’s regulatory perimeter. PERG addresses the question every business contemplating financial services activity must answer: do my proposed activities require FCA authorisation? The substance is technical — interpreting the Regulated Activities Order, the FSMA framework, and decades of regulatory precedent — but the practical importance is fundamental. Operating regulated activity without authorisation is a criminal offence under section 23 of FSMA. Wrongly concluding that activity is unregulated when it is regulated exposes principals to enforcement, customer claims, and contracts that may be unenforceable.
This guide explains how PERG actually works in practice — its structure, how perimeter analysis is conducted, the principal regulated activities and how to identify them, the common boundary cases and grey areas, and the recurring patterns where firms get perimeter analysis wrong. It also covers the recruitment dimension — the senior compliance and legal expertise needed for substantive perimeter analysis, particularly in firms operating novel business models.
What’s missing from most online explanations of PERG is the practical interpretation of boundary cases. The framework is well-documented; what’s harder to find is how to navigate the genuinely ambiguous situations where activities sit close to the regulatory perimeter — and where wrong conclusions have substantial consequences. That’s the gap this guide fills.
Why PERG Matters
The general prohibition under section 19 of FSMA is uncompromising: no person may carry on a regulated activity in the UK unless they are authorised or exempt. Breach is a criminal offence under section 23. Beyond criminal liability, breach has commercial consequences:
- Contracts entered into in breach of the general prohibition are typically unenforceable by the firm
- Counterparties have rights to recover money paid under such contracts plus compensation for loss
- Senior individuals involved face personal regulatory consequences and potential criminal liability
- Insurance coverage for resulting claims may be excluded
- Subsequent FCA authorisation applications face significant Fit & Proper concerns
For these reasons, perimeter analysis is one of the most consequential pieces of regulatory work any business considering financial services activity must conduct. Wrong conclusions are very costly to correct.
The Structure of PERG
PERG is structured into chapters covering different aspects of perimeter analysis:
- PERG 1 — overview of regulated activities and the perimeter framework
- PERG 2 — authorisation and regulated activities
- PERG 3A — guidance on insurance distribution activities
- PERG 4 — guidance on regulated activities for mortgages
- PERG 5 — insurance distribution activities and IDD
- PERG 6 — collective investment schemes
- PERG 7 — periodical publications, news services and broadcasts
- PERG 8 — financial promotions
- PERG 9 — meaning of “open-ended investment company”
- PERG 10-12 — various activity-specific guidance
- PERG 13 — guidance on MiFID activities
- PERG 14 — guidance on home reversion and home purchase activities
- PERG 15 — guidance on the scope of MCD
- PERG 16 — scope of MiFID
- PERG 17-21 — various sector-specific guidance
- PERG 22 — claims management activities
- PERG 23 — guidance on certain investment activities
- PERG 24-26 — other specialist topics
The breadth of PERG reflects the breadth of regulated activities — which span investment, banking, insurance, payments, lending, advice, custody, and many specialist areas.
The Regulated Activities Framework
The substantive list of regulated activities is set out in the Regulated Activities Order (FSMA 2000 (Regulated Activities) Order 2001, as amended). The Order operates by:
- Defining specific regulated activities
- Defining specific investments to which those activities relate
- Setting out exclusions and exemptions from each activity
For an activity to be regulated, it must:
- Fall within a specified regulated activity
- Be carried on “by way of business”
- Relate to a specified investment (where applicable)
- Not fall within an applicable exclusion
Principal regulated activity categories
The principal categories include:
- Deposit-taking — accepting deposits from the public
- Issuing electronic money — under EMR framework
- Payment services — under PSR framework
- Insurance contracts — effecting and carrying out
- Insurance distribution — under IDD framework
- Investment activities — including dealing, arranging, managing, advising on investments, operating CIS
- Mortgage activities — entering into, administering, advising on, arranging mortgages
- Consumer credit — providing credit, broking credit, debt management
- Specialist activities — including custody, safeguarding and administration of investments, certain trading activities
- Cryptoasset activities — currently primarily under MLR 2017 with broader regulatory framework being developed
- Funeral plan activities — added to the regulatory perimeter in 2022
For full authorisation context, see our How to Become FCA Authorised Guide.
Conducting Perimeter Analysis
Effective perimeter analysis follows a structured methodology:
Step 1: Activity description
Describe the proposed activity with sufficient detail to engage with the regulatory framework — what specifically is being done, with whom, in what context, and what the financial consequences are.
Step 2: Investment identification
Where the activity relates to specific investments (shares, bonds, derivatives, insurance contracts, mortgages, etc.), identify which specified investments are engaged.
Step 3: Activity classification
Map the activity to specific regulated activity definitions in the Regulated Activities Order. Multiple regulated activities may be engaged.
Step 4: “By way of business” test
Confirm whether the activity is being carried on “by way of business” — generally meaning more than incidental activity in the context of a commercial enterprise.
Step 5: Exclusion analysis
Identify any exclusions that may apply — exclusions are activity-specific and often substantively narrow.
Step 6: Conclusion
Reach a conclusion on whether each component of the proposed activity engages a regulated activity, with documented reasoning.
Step 7: Authorisation strategy
Where regulated activity is engaged, plan the authorisation approach — direct authorisation, AR arrangement, exemption reliance, or activity restructuring to avoid the perimeter.
Perimeter analysis should always be documented substantively — not just summarised. Where the FCA subsequently questions whether an activity is properly within or outside the regulatory perimeter, the firm’s documented analysis is the primary defence. Where the firm has relied on legal advice, the advice should be retained. Where the firm has reached its own conclusion, the reasoning should be documented in detail. Firms operating activity close to the regulatory perimeter without documented analysis face substantially weaker positions if subsequently challenged.
Common Perimeter Boundary Cases
Many activities sit close to regulatory perimeter boundaries, requiring substantive analysis:
Information vs advice
Providing information about financial products is generally not advising on investments. Recommending specific products to specific customers is. The boundary is genuinely substantive — particularly for digital platforms, robo-advice models, and content-based businesses.
Introducing vs arranging
Introducer activity that simply refers customers to authorised firms may avoid the regulated activity of arranging — but the boundary depends on the substance of the introduction. Substantive engagement with the financial decision can constitute arranging.
Personal investment vs investment management
Managing your own investments is not a regulated activity. Managing investments of others — even on a small scale or for friends/family — may be. The “by way of business” test interacts with this.
Lending vs deferred consideration
Providing credit is regulated. Allowing a counterparty to defer payment for goods or services may not be — but the boundary depends on the structure.
Cryptoasset activities
Cryptoasset activities have historically been a substantial perimeter analysis area — particularly around what activities engage MLR 2017 registration, which engage broader regulatory requirements, and how new cryptoasset activities map to existing regulatory categories.
Buy-now-pay-later
BNPL has been a substantive perimeter analysis area, with the regulatory treatment evolving as the FCA brings specific BNPL activities within the perimeter through new legislation.
Insurance vs warranty
Insurance contracts are regulated; warranties may not be. The boundary depends on the substance of the obligation, not just the labelling.
Discretionary vs non-discretionary
Investment management with discretionary authority is a different regulated activity from non-discretionary advisory arrangements. The substance of the authority granted matters more than the contractual labelling.
Wholesale vs retail
Some regulated activities have specific wholesale exemptions or different rules for wholesale-only activity. The classification of customers as wholesale or retail can affect both whether the activity is regulated and what rules apply.
Exclusions and Exemptions
The Regulated Activities Order includes various exclusions and exemptions:
Activity-specific exclusions
Each regulated activity has specific exclusions that narrow its scope. Common examples include exclusions for activities undertaken in the course of a profession or non-investment business, certain activities by employers in relation to employees, and various sector-specific narrowing.
The Article 72E exemption
One of the more frequently invoked exemptions, applying to activities that arise in the course of carrying on certain non-financial businesses where the financial activity is incidental.
The overseas persons exclusion
For non-UK firms providing services to UK customers — though the exclusion has narrowed over time and is now limited.
The corporate finance contact exclusion
For certain corporate finance activities involving sophisticated investors.
Exclusion analysis is technical and frequently requires specialist legal advice. Generic reliance on exclusions without substantive analysis is a recurring source of perimeter difficulty.
Financial Promotions Perimeter
PERG 8 specifically addresses financial promotions — covered separately by section 21 of FSMA. The financial promotion regime operates as a distinct perimeter:
- Communicating financial promotions in the UK is restricted under section 21
- Promotions can only be communicated by authorised persons or with the approval of authorised persons
- Specific exemptions apply — typically requiring detailed analysis
- Recent regulatory reform has tightened the financial promotions framework, particularly for high-risk investments
Financial promotions perimeter analysis is operationally important for any business communicating about financial products — including digital platforms, content businesses, and businesses with corporate finance activity.
When Activities Become Regulated — Perimeter Expansion
The regulatory perimeter has expanded over time. Recent expansions include:
- Funeral plans (2022) — brought from voluntary regulation into FCA authorisation
- Cryptoasset MLR 2017 registration (2020) — bringing certain cryptoasset activities into AML supervision
- Buy-now-pay-later — phased regulation as the activity has grown
- Pre-paid card products — various tightening over time
- Claims management activities (2019) — moved from voluntary regulation to FCA
Firms operating in evolving sectors should monitor regulatory perimeter developments — activity that is currently outside the perimeter may move within it through legislative change.
Common Perimeter Pitfalls
Reliance on labelling rather than substance. Where activities are labelled as not constituting a regulated activity but the substance engages the regulatory definitions.
Generic exclusion reliance. Where exclusions are invoked without substantive analysis of whether the specific activity meets the exclusion criteria.
“By way of business” misapplication. Where the test is interpreted too narrowly to exclude commercial activity.
Failure to update perimeter analysis. Where activity evolves over time and earlier perimeter analysis is no longer current.
Inadequate documentation. Where conclusions are reached without documented analytical reasoning.
Multi-activity gaps. Where some elements of an activity are correctly identified as regulated but others are missed.
Cross-border perimeter issues. Where activity spans multiple jurisdictions and UK perimeter implications are not fully analysed.
Financial promotion overlap. Where the regulated activity perimeter is correctly assessed but the financial promotion perimeter is missed.
Regulatory change blindness. Where firms operate on perimeter analysis that doesn’t reflect more recent regulatory developments.
PERG and Senior Recruitment
Effective perimeter analysis requires specific senior expertise:
- Senior compliance leadership — typically SMF16 (see our SMF16 Guide) — owns overall regulatory perimeter responsibility
- General counsel / Head of Legal — substantial perimeter analysis sits at the regulatory/legal boundary
- Specialist regulatory counsel — for novel business models, external specialist legal advice is frequently necessary
- Regulatory consultants — particularly for firms in sectors with active regulatory development
For firms operating novel business models or in sectors with active regulatory development (cryptoassets, fintech, BNPL), perimeter analysis capability is a meaningful senior team consideration. Firms operating close to the regulatory perimeter without strong perimeter analysis capability face substantial regulatory risk.
A Note from Our Founder — Adrian Lawrence FCA
Perimeter analysis is the most consequential piece of regulatory work many businesses will ever conduct. Wrong conclusions are very costly to correct — operating regulated activity without authorisation creates criminal liability, contractual unenforceability, and substantial commercial consequences. Yet perimeter analysis is also frequently under-invested in, particularly by firms that consider their activities clearly outside the perimeter without conducting substantive analysis.
The recruitment angle that comes up most often in our placements is the senior team capability for firms operating close to the regulatory perimeter. Fintech firms, cryptoasset firms, BNPL providers, and businesses with novel financial services models all benefit from senior compliance and legal capability with substantive perimeter analysis experience. The candidate pool with this combination of skills is meaningfully tight — particularly for novel business models where the analysis is genuinely difficult.
For boards considering activities that may engage the regulatory perimeter, the practical advice is to conduct substantive perimeter analysis early — not after material commercial commitments have been made. Where the analysis identifies regulated activity, the planning timeline for authorisation can be 9-15 months (see our How to Become FCA Authorised Guide). Boards that discover regulated activity engagement late in commercial planning frequently face difficult decisions about timing and structure.
At FD Capital we work on senior compliance and legal mandates regularly across UK firms operating close to the regulatory perimeter. If you are recruiting senior compliance leadership and want to discuss perimeter analysis dimensions, I’m happy to have a direct conversation.
Speak to Adrian about a senior compliance appointment →
Adrian Lawrence FCA | Founder, FD Capital | ICAEW Verified Fellow | ICAEW-Registered Practice | Companies House no. 13329383
Hire Senior Compliance Leaders
Effective perimeter analysis requires senior compliance and legal capability with substantive regulatory expertise. FD Capital places SMF16 holders, Heads of Compliance, and senior compliance leaders for FCA-regulated firms and firms approaching regulatory authorisation.
020 3287 9501
Chief Compliance Officer Recruitment › | FCA Regulated Firm Recruitment | Contact Us
Further Reading and Authoritative Sources
For PERG itself, see PERG in the FCA Handbook. For the Regulated Activities Order, see the legislation.gov.uk page. For FSMA, see FSMA 2000.
Related Guides: FCA Handbook and Authorisation
Part of FD Capital’s series of practical guides for FCA-regulated firms: SYSC — Senior Management Arrangements | PRIN — The 11 FCA Principles | SUP — The Supervision Manual | DISP — Dispute Resolution | How to Become FCA Authorised | The FCA Application Process & Costs | FCA Threshold Conditions | The Appointed Representative Regime | SMF16 — Compliance Oversight




